Welcome to The Leftist Review

Please join our discussion community.

You must log in to your account to leave comments. If you do not have an account, simply register and begin posting comments on articles now. To register, you will need to create a user name and provide a valid email address. Your privacy is guaranteed--your email and information will never be shared. Your password will be sent to your registered email. Thank you!

Member Login
Lost your password?
Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Pastures of Hope

February 14, 2011

A mad man opens fire on a crowd, killing a Federal Judge and wounding a Congresswoman. Is it a sign that we need more gun control? Can government regulation solve this problem? It is a conundrum, that while states have moved to decriminalize marijuana laws because of a failed prohibition, some look to the same prohibition to protect them from firearms.

I owned a handgun for over thirty years; I bought it because I used to carry large cash bank deposits. I was working in a high crime area and sometimes worked until after dark. When I made my purchase I was required to fill out a form and to wait for seven days. I then went down to the courthouse and obtained a permit to carry the pistol. I never fired the pistol in anger and was very happy about that. I kept the pistol in a locked cabinet in my home.

I am the norm, I treated the firearm with due respect. I have known lots of gun owners that do the same. My uncle collected hand guns, he had over two hundred in his collection, but since I was a child, I never saw even one of them. It is very similar to the arguments for tighter control of alcohol or drugs. Those who abuse them make headlines, while those who act responsibly are punished.

There is a larger question at play here, what makes Americans so violent? Why do Canadians who also own guns not use them to kill each other?

In 1999 two high school students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold went on a shooting rampage in Columbine Colorado. They killed twelve people and wounded twenty one before committing suicide. In the aftermath of the shootings, a huge range of activities were placed under scrutiny, Goth culture, bullying, video games and violent television programs. Two years before the crime, Eric Harris began a website, bragging about his mischief, giving instructions on how to make pipe bombs and issuing threats against his perceived enemies. So serious were these threats that the police became involved.

In 1998 Harris and Klebold were arrested and charged and convicted of felony theft after breaking in and stealing tools and equipment from a van. As juveniles, they were entered into a diversionary program, after several weeks they completed the program for anger management they were released early, though kept on probation. Harris bragged on his blog about feigning remorse for the crime. He began to be treated by a psychologist and when he complained of depression, anger and suicidal thoughts he was prescribed the medication Zoloft. After a few weeks he complained of restlessness and an inability to concentrate and his medication was changed to Luvox.

These two boys illegally obtained firearms and manufactured their own explosive devices. We can blame video games and television or bullying but these youths were seriously mentally ill. Their actions were extreme and over the edge. They were celebrating Adolf Hitler’s birthday and their parents had no idea. Doesn’t that imply some level of detachment on the parents’ part?

We want the quick fix in America, faster, cheaper, easier, or just take a pill. Let’s put warning labels on CDs and video games. Let’s pass more and more restrictive laws that make us feel good, but fail to address the real issue. People who open fire on crowds are mentally ill. This type of crime is very different than robbery or a crime of passion. The victims are anonymous; the shooters are attacking the idea of their own powerlessness. In 1932 Chicago mayor Anton Cermack was murdered while standing next to President elect Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The shooter claimed no animosity towards the President elect, but only the idea of the Presidency. In this current tragedy much has been made of Sarah Palin’s website and conservative talk radio. I’m no fan of Sarah Palin, nor do I like Conservative talk radio, but let’s try and keep this in perspective. Millions listen, but only one acted. It might seem like a great opportunity to make political hay on the backs of conservatives and Sarah Palin, but millions listen, but only one acted. The Columbine shooters didn’t listen to Rush or Glenn, the issue here is mental illness.

The son of Sam killer in New York claimed that his dog was giving him instructions to kill. The issue is mental illness, not dog control.

Forty percent of the soldiers who went ashore in France in June of 1944 never fired their weapons. Despite, intensive training, despite being shot at and being under extreme pressure they did not fire their weapons. German forces also reported large numbers of troops who refused to fire because it is difficult to shoot and kill someone. It goes against our nature; we are taught from childhood that it is wrong to kill. Some can overcome that prohibition, some cannot.

I had a friend who was a policeman involved with trying to talk out a mental patient who was holding his mother hostage with a shotgun. The patient was on the porch of his mother’s home and had started to put the gun down; he then paused for a second and then raised the gun up to fire. My friend shot and killed him, and he explained to me the pain and emotional torment that he felt over the incident years later. He had relived the experience a thousand times in his head and though there really was no other choice, he still questioned himself.

He explained that as bad as the emotional torment was from the incident itself, the treatment he received after the event, he felt was far worse. The other policeman began to call him John Wayne and Dirty Harry around the station house. Even his fellow officers failed to understand the emotional torment of killing a man.

We treat mental illness in this country only on Cadillac insurance plans. We allow those who are dangerously ill to walk the streets among us. To commit someone to an institution against their will is very difficult, even someone such as Eric Harris who had made direct death threats against fellow students. A minor who bragged of illegally owning firearms and of making pipe bombs, a mental patient who bragged of his desire to kill and cause mayhem.

We live in a very controlling and one size fits all society, our media glorifies the use of firearms. In our inner cities there exists an urban jungle that defines its residents as either predator or prey, where a gun makes the difference. Choices for the residents are very stark and rigid. Underfunded schools, poor job prospects make illegal opportunities attractive, so we have gang wars and turf wars, senseless violence. During the 1990s, a sewer contractor in East Los Angeles began hiring gang members as workers. He needed workers unafraid of the area. He reported that all the workers he hired had quit the gangs within six weeks.

It’s nice to draw a decent paycheck; it’s nice not to have to look over your shoulder. It’s hard work to work all day doing construction and then to hang out with the gang at night. These people are just people, trying to survive in the world in which they live. We could try to take away the guns just as we’ve tried to take away the drugs and prostitution. Until we try to fix the situation as a whole, we are destined to failure. Poverty breeds crime, poverty breeds violence, and a feeling in the poor that they are being alienated and oppressed by nameless, faceless society.

The recent police shooting in Detroit offers no insight. It makes no sense, except that Detroit is a city crumbling from off-shoring and foreign trade deals. It is a city that once offered decent blue collar union jobs and that now offers only despair. The difference between urban and rural cultures should not be discounted. In the suburbs, perhaps one in ten Americans might go hunting, while among the Southern, Western or rural populations it might be as high as fifty percent. The perspectives on guns and gun control become blurred and distorted.

Politicians use it as a red flag, “them liberals is out to take yer guns away!” It makes our politicians cowardly as any reform can be used to wave the flag in front of the bull. There was actually an ammunition shortage when Barack Obama was elected President. Conservatives warned, “Obama’s going to take your guns!” More accurately, the shortage had more to do with a federal law requiring the US military to buy its ammunition domestically.

Our omnipresent media offers single answers like a hamburger stand drive through window. Already, Congressmen have called for more repressive laws. Yet we fail to ask ourselves the basic question, why does this happen in the United States and not in other countries? Why does a woman fired from her job at Kraft foods walk back in with a gun and open fire on her coworkers? Could it be a sense of hopelessness? Being fired from a job and unlikely to find another? Why did a ninety year old widow in Akron shoot herself twice in the chest as marshals waited on her porch to deliver foreclosure papers?

From the CIA Fact Book – “In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products.”

To me, at least, this statement says more than the second amendment. It is the United States government proclaiming to the world what it believes to be true, “In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions.”

The market says that Mental Health treatment is too expensive. The market says unions and job protection programs are too expensive. The markets say ninety year old widows don’t need protection from crooked bankers and deserve to lose their homes. The market says it’s a scary world out there because they make it a scary world out there. They lock millions out of a decent education, then force them into crumbling dilapidated ghettos. Then the market says, pull yourself up by your own boot straps! Every gun used in every crime in this country began its life as money in the till for corporate America. How can we fix that when, “In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions”?

There is no single solution, any more than there is a single solution for drug abuse or alcoholism. The peddlers of alcohol are just honest businessmen while the peddlers of drugs are fiends. The peddlers of motorcycles and jet ski’s are just honest businessmen as well. This is the price we pay for Capitalism; this is the world we build. The market place doesn’t care about the consequences, we declare all equal under the umbrella of personal responsibility, but not all are equal. The consequences are just another profit opportunity.

An eighteen year old doesn’t understand mortality as well as a thirty-five year old. A gun to a kid in Nebraska or Alabama means something different than it does to a kid in Compton or Harlem. Without a job or on the verge of losing your home, a gun can become something different to us all. We must do something, something radical. It will require us to turn off our TV’s and get off of our couch. It will be harder than just lobbying for tougher laws. We must begin to lobby for a fairer society–a society where losing your job does not mean the end of your life. We must build a society that offers pastures of hope rather than ghettos of despair–where we build new universities and close old prisons. We must change the message our government proclaims to, “In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms and government officials make most of the decisions based on fairness, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy no greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products.”

David Glenn Cox is a staff writer for TLR and an award winning writer and musician; he is the author of the novel, The Servants of Pilate.


The Leftist Review advocates the adoption within the United States of a Canadian-style system of firearm regulation.


Tags: , , ,

5 Responses to Pastures of Hope

  1. David Glenn Cox on March 7, 2011 at 8:45 am

    I wanted to wait until I had time to properly answer your comments. For the record, hand guns do not make me feel safe. That seems a red herring issue, the issue it seems to me is law and justice. In a society without justice there will never be enough laws to make you safe.

    Without justice law just becomes a tool for government control and enforcement. We as a nation spend billions of dollars fighting illegal drugs. Yet, I could buy heroin on most any street corner and not only that but I could buy it cheaper than the government authorized drugs. If you are Cindy McCain or Michael Jackson or Rush Limbaugh getting drugs is merely a question of money. They don’t fear busts or cops kicking in their doors and so our prisons fill up disproportionately with the poor.

    Two weeks ago my son was attacked and shot in the back by a felon on parole in possession of an illegal handgun. This felon was on parole and my son had been dating his ex-wife. This person had beat this woman to a pulp in the past. She a protective court order against this person. He had been arrested for another crime and sent to prison. He was released on parole and immediately violated the protective order and was sent back to jail. Then he was released again in November, and again he violated the judges order, again threatening this woman’s life.

    He was again released from jail and within 48 hours he stalked and baited a trap for my son before attempting to murder him. Ask yourself? If he had threatened the judge or the judge’s life or his wife’s life would he have ever been released from jail? This community where this occurred has what they call code enforcement officers. They go through neighborhoods and give people tickets for leaving their lawnmowers out or letting the grass get too tall in their yard. The county has money for that! My daughter on a high school graduation prank egged some houses. She was a arrested and held in jail under a $5,000 bond.

    They wanted to charge her and the others involved with committing terrorist acts, a felony. Because her mother was unemployed she couldn’t post bond and an eighteen year old high school girl had to spend 24 hours in county lock up. I was a passenger in a car and we were pulled over because I didn’t have my seat belt on. That was the only reason that we were pulled over. I was ID’ed and wants and warrants run on me and then the officer began to ask me about drugs. No doubt because of my long hair and the old clunker we were riding in. That’s what the law gets you, Innocent people are harassed
    and bothered while the criminals couldn’t care less about the law.

    If we had been riding in a new Mercedes would we have even been pulled over in the first place? Would we have been interrogated and treated like criminals? This is what police law enforcement gets you. The man who shot my son had a marked history for violence! He had a marked history for violating the judges order and yet the court system didn’t even have the courtesy to call and tell her he was out of prison.

    Who is responsible for shooting my son? A violent criminal obviously in need of mental help? Or a judge who rubber stamps papers, like Otis in Mayberry he’s served his time Barney, so let him out now. Now, after a serious crime has been committed, now the law steps in. Now this guy is looking at decades of hard time plus five more years for a felon in possession of a firearm. Now after it doesn’t matter and the damage has been done the court system will lock him up and throw away the key.

    Look what’s missing here? Look at what should have been done and could have been done two years ago and for pennies on the dollar. There is not an opium poppy growing within five thousand miles of my house yet I can buy heroin today. I don’t because I don’t want to, I could buy a gun or prostitute but I don’t want to.

    A society without justice will just keep passing more and more restrictive laws. Creating the dangerous illusion of safety, because tougher laws won’t save you from the criminals a just society will. The honest and the innocent become sandwiched in between reactionary law enforcement and the criminals they are supposed to protect you from.

    I want to again thank the editors of this site for their understanding. I understand that my own position on this issue is controversial but I also understand that each law passed makes you less free. The difference between a good law or a bad law is only in how it is enforced.

  2. liberalvoice on March 5, 2011 at 4:31 pm

    If we dealt with our social problems the way Europeans do, we might be able to deal with the gun problem the same way.

  3. Bill Weato on March 4, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    I agree about the social issues. But we should keep in mind that clearly, the Second Ammendment doesn’t grant the right to any and all arms. There is a class of what one might call Second Ammendment weapons at the moment; those that are acceptible to society. That class changes. We ban stinger missiles, rpg’s, and a host of other weapons. We need to come together and impose some sanity on this issue.

    The NRA does nothing positive and fans the flames of fanaticism whenever it can. Limiting the lethality of weapons is just common sense. Article Four of the Constitution provides for freedom of movement and travel throughout the states. That doesn’t mean one has the right to travel on the interstate at 130 mph. Restrictions apply. Why? Because it’s a matter of life and death and of balancing one person’s right against those of all other people. It’s the citizenry protecting themselves from the crazy or irresponsible individual. So it is with guns. Why is the concept so difficult for some people? You have a right to be able to protect yourself and your family; you don’t have a right to be able to take out the National Guard.

    As Lawrence O’Donnell said, (may not be an exact quote), “I blame the madman for the first ten bullets. I blame the law for the next 21.” Thanks Republican Party!

    Let me sum this up by saying: if you can’t feel safe in your house with a half-dozen ten-round [instead of 31 round] clips for your Glock, (guntards), you should see a psychiatrist ASAP!

    • mavaughn on March 6, 2011 at 7:50 pm


      You had a very sound argument – until your last sentence. You reek of extremism like that same group whom you accuse. Check your reality, man – maybe you need help yourself.

      I thought this article is well crafted. It got my thinking cap buzzing into overdrive and opened my eyes to new ideas. Yes, this “guntard” has an open mind!

      Oh, by the way, for reference: I live in the Northwest, U.S., own guns, hunt, and am a democrat. I cannot remember the last time I voted for a candidate with an “R” behind their name. I am not a member of the NRA or any other lobbying organization.

      • SteveH on April 12, 2011 at 12:57 pm

        To mavaughn:

        Mr. Weato “reek(s) of extremism”? That’s an impressive non sequitur! I think his position (limiting magazine size) meets pro-gun people not halfway, but most of the way. Just what is an extremist to you? Anyone who doesn’t think guns are awesomely wonderful to have around? One of your self-confessed pastimes is killing animals with weapons, and you think *he’s* an extremist. Animals are beings too, not just targets for your entertainment. Whether you’re aware of it or not, animals live complex lives, have complex social structures, feel joy, pain, and loss. Maybe you should examine your own consciousness and see what’s going on with that.

Leave a Reply